January 18, 2010

Arlington Green appointed to Cty Energy/Environment Task Force

General — @ 12:42 pm
RE: Energy/environmental taskforce–appointment of an Arlington Green‏
From: John Reeder 
Sent: Mon 1/18/10 4:38 PM
To:  
Cc:  
Bcc:  
Dear Jay:
 
Thank you for appointing Mr. Davis as a representative of the Arlington Greens on this task force.  We look forward to providing input through him and receiving feed back on the progress the task force is making.  Mr. Davis is an accomplished aviation transportation economist and environmentalist and longtime Arlington resident; he will make good contributions.
 
Sincerely,
 
John Reeder
on behalf of the Arlington Green Party
 

Subject: FW: Energy/environmental taskforce
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:47:06 -0500

Dear John –

 

Thank you for your letter regarding the Community Energy and Sustainability Task.  I appreciate your support for the effort and your interest in having a representative of the Green Party participate.  As you know, the CES Task Force is a serious effort to identify goals for the reduction of countywide greenhouse gas emission, and the strategies and actions necessary to reach those goals.  This is a bold and ambitious undertaking for a local government, but I believe Arlington is up to the task and may well establish a model for others to follow.

Since announcing this initiative, I have heard from many individuals and organizations expressing their interest in participating in the process.  As a result, we have created a category of official “Liaison” to the Community Energy and Sustainability (CES) Task Force that includes such organizations as the Nature Conservancy, George Mason University and the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.  I would welcome Steve Davis as a Liaison from the Arlington Green Party, and have copied him on this email.  We will include Steve on the appropriate email distribution list unless we hear otherwise.

Establishing official Liaisons is meant to further open the process to other valuable organizations that can contribute to this effort.  A Liaison will:

Receive CES Task Force meeting agendas and most meeting materials (via email);

  • Have reserved space at official CES Task Force meetings to observe, though not participate in discussion;
  • Be encouraged to attend and participate in Community Energy Town Hall Meetings and other public forums;
  • Be encouraged to comment on and contribute to the development of the Community Energy Plan between official CES Task Force meetings; and
  • Be listed by name and organization in the final version of the Community Energy Plan as a Liaison to the CES Task Force.

 

The first meeting of the CES Task Force was held on January 15.  Future dates are: March 19, May 14, July 16, September 17, November 18 and January 14, 2010.  Meetings will be held at the Arlington Central Library unless otherwise stated.  Full information from the CES Task Force will be regularly refreshed at www.arlingtonva.us/energyplan.

 

John, there are no political parties represented on the CES Task Force.  But based upon your letter, I agree that it is a good idea to invite our local political parties to participate if they are interested, so I will be inviting both the Arlington Republican and Democratic Committees to identify an official Liaison to the CES Task Force as well.

 

Best,

 

Jay

 

Jay Fisette

Chair, Arlington County Board

2100 Clarendon Boulevard

Suite 300

Arlington, VA 22201

703-228-3130 Office

jfisette@arlingtonva.us

 

From: John Reeder
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:14 AM
To: Jay Fisette
Subject: Energy/environmental taskforce

 

Jay Fisette
Chairman
Arlington County Board
Arlington, VA                                              January 7, 2010
 
Dear Jay:
 
Congratulations on your election as the chairman of the county board. 
 
We also congratulate you on appointing a task  force to address environmental sustainability in Arlington.  As you know, the Arlington Greens have long advocated better environmental program in our community.
 
Unfortunately, it appears that you have neglected to invite any Arlington Greens to participate on your taskforce.  We think this is unfortunate.  We ask that you appoint a Green to this task force: Mr. Steve Davis.  We previously nominated Mr. Davis for the Environmental, Energy and Energy Conservation Commission.
 
In early December, I contacted you and indicated that we would like to have Mr. Davis appointed to the Environmental, Energy and Conservation Commission.  At that time, you did not indicate that you were thinking of creating yet another environmental advisory group.
 
We would like your new taskforce to be non-partisan and objective and insightful, and to have recommendations that can be accepted by the Arlington community as legitimate.  It appears to us that this task force is disproportionately composed of represenatives of fossil fuel dependent companies and associations who are unlikely to come up with meaningful recommendations to move Arlington to less fossil fuel use.
 
The Arlington Green Party is the primary opposition party in Arlington in local races.  We would hope that you see the wisdom of including Greens on the taskforce.
 
 
We would be glad to meet with you to discuss  our ideas.
 
 
Sincerely,
 
John Reeder
on behalf of  the Arlington Green Party

 

Tagged:

September 5, 2008

Columbia Pike Trolley will not save energy or reduce carbon footprint

General,Statement — @ 6:00 pm

The Democratic incumbent Ms. Favola insisted at our candidates’ debate before the Arlington Civic Federation that a new Columbia Pike Trolley would save energy and encourage further development on the Pike.  There have been many technical studies done on the proposed Pike trolley, and it is clear that a trolley will not necessarily speed or ease Arlington commuters ride to/from the Pentagon.

Arlington County Government and Ms. Favola argue that a trolley is more “Green,” i.e. saves carbon based energy over current buses or over using the larger rapid transit buses.  Academic studies have reached different conclusions, depending on how many passengers ride, frequency, and cost  of installing light rail in the ground.  In general, taking into account all the energy used to operate and to install and build a trolley system,  buses are more energy efficient.

It appears that a fully loaded bus uses on average less operating energy (BTUs) per passenger mile than does light rail per passenger mile, and about the same energy as heavy rail like Metrorail.  Source: M.J. Bradley & Associates, May 2007, Comparison of  Energy Use and Emissions from Different Transportation Modes, submitted to American Bus Association, , p. 4.

Moreover, many ART and Metro buses are now burning clean natural  gas (CNG) with very little emissions and higher efficiency than diesel.  Electricity for the trolley will come from the new coal-fired Dominion Electric plant located in Wise, VA, that will use coal mined from mountain tops in VA and WVA.  Coal-fired electricity contributes to significant air pollution and to destruction of natural mountains.  It also adds more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than CNG.  The VA Green Party opposes the construction of Wise coal-fire electricity plant.

One must also add the amount of energy it will take to build a light rail system on Columbia Pike which will include moving all the underground utility lines under the Pike, resurfacing with asphalt and cement (all of which are very energy intensive). The energy incorporated in the steel rails, and in the cooper overhead power lines that will have to be added.  The energy bulldozers and earth movers will use to relocate utility lines must be included.  The energy it takes to manufacture a trolley car and a bus are probably about the same or might favor the  bus.   Steel, copper wire, cement and asphalt have become very expensive owing to higher commodity and petroleum prices over the past several years.

My understanding is that the estimated $150 million cost of the trolley (including  that portion in Fairfax County up to Skyline) does NOT  include the cost of replacing utility lines under the Pike.

This is technical argument as to energy savings that depends on your assumptions, but Favola’s contention that a trolley obviously uses less energy than buses is dubious. More  importantly, the County has not satisfied the U.S. DOT or they would have received federal funds.  If DOT thinks the trolley is unsound, it probably is.

Ms. Favola did accurately acknowledge that a trolley is really a development booster for land on or just off the Pike.  In other words, public money will be used to increase the value of land around or on the Pike benefitting land owners or developers who own it.  Why should our county government use scarce dollars better spent on a new Wakefield High School or modest apartments for frail elderly  or  the disabled and give it to rich landowners or corporations?

Favola also fails to acknowledge the obvious fact that higher priced land will eliminate the last remaining moderate rental apartments, Fillmore Gardens or Barcroft Apartments, for example.  This is exactly what happened in north Arlington along the Rosslyn-Ballston corridor.  Favola and the other county board members want to turn Columbia Pike into another Rosslyn-Ballston high rise luxury housing and upscale living.

Is this fair that county public funds be used to contribute to eviction of moderate rental residents or to much higher rents for these folks?  After all, it is their taxes as well that are being given to developers.  No, it is unfair, and a misuse of scarce public dollars.